The wait for IE to join the league of the more easy-to-use, feature-rich browsers is over. While Firefox just entered the ring with many already popular browsers to compete with, it still managed to capture a good percentage of the market in a comparatively short span of time. IE has remained the most used browser ever since its version 5 release with Windows 98. Firefox began penetrating right from day one of its release. Now both IE and Firefox have come out with a new version. For IE it has been a leap, while for Firefox it's just been a hop-over from its already evolved product to a more evolved version. Just lately, we did a feature of the Firefox 2 beta, you can have a look at here . Firefox 2 hasn't changed much from its beta release; so, talking much about it would just be a mere repetition. We will look a lot more at IE 7 and compare the two briefly. Let's kick off this concise feature about these two browsers as they battle it out for market share.
Looks
The looks of IE 7 have been bumped up to feel all fresh and new. It's basically the Vista look and feel. This isn't a beauty contest, but that's what Microsoft personally feels making most of the changes to the whole of Vista family, mostly cosmetic. IE7, being a part of Vista, has also undergone cosmetic changes, and at the same time has even become a lot more feature-rich than its previous version.
This version of IE gives that all-clear look. If you keep a window of IE 7 open beside a window of IE 6, you will notice the changes and for all you know you might just not be able to tell if it's IE in the first place.
That's unless you have seen or had a peek at Vista. IE 7 is better-looking than Firefox 2 (default skin) but that's not the only thing we actually want at the end of the day. While IE flaunts all the beauty, Firefox on the other hand hasn't changed much in terms of looks to make it look more cool.
Its previous version was very plain and simple and we all liked it. The newer version, looking at the competition, has the use of make-up and has done a few minor touch-up jobs. The buttons are neatly rounded off giving the button-bar a sweet look and at the same time has maintained its simplicity. IE 7, with its Vista look, has an all glass theme, the buttons and the whole look has been changed so that it syncs well with Vista. There is no doubt that IE 7 is better-looking, but Firefox with its simple beauty will still continue to capture more users.
Interface
After reading about the looks of both browsers, it would be best to talk about the interface. The opinion on interface is going to be different from person to person. While for some, it will be really easy; for the others, they will just walk away from it saying that "it's really not my type". The interface of IE has been upgraded; oh! no it's just a mere face-lift. Actually, it's the look that has changed and the change in look has made the minor differences in interface. IE has very limited customization. You have to agree that the default organization of the menus and bars is as good as it can get for IE.
Firefox is open to a lot of customizations and the screenshots of Firefox used throughout the review will show that it offers more view at one time than IE. It's not very drastic, but Firefox shows a couple more lines, which make a lot of difference to people who do a lot of online reading. Even though the Menu bar in IE 7 is gone missing, it can be accessed by pressing the Alt key. It still falls short of customizing it further to have a lot of matter viewed at a glance. The only way to increase the content at a glance would be by zooming out; we will talk about the zoom feature later. This would jus drop the size of the text making it hard on your eyes; even in Firefox it can be done and it would end up showing still more content but at the same cost of your eyes.
IE 7 has a whole new setup of history and favorites. It's completely redone. The favorites and history have been merged in a single drop-down box. In the drop-down box, they are separated into tabs and there is a new addition, an RSS feeds tab. The history search is still available; you have to choose from a small drop-down beside the history tab.
The Menu bar, as I said earlier, is invisible and can be seen after pressing the Alt key. There are a set of buttons to the end of the Tab bar, which can't be moved any where else except you can make it drop down to the end. This has a plus point; I'll discuss in the next section because it has more relevance there.
The best part is that the basic shortcuts have been kept as standard. So, there is no need to get used to a new set of shortcuts. Opening/closing Tabs/Windows and even switching between tabs are standard. Apart from that, minor changes are acceptable and which are likely to differ from browser to browser.
coolramiz- 11-12-2006
Tabbed Browsing
And IE finally changed; that's what you must be saying for sure after all the reading but have they done a good job of it? In fact, Microsoft has added a few more features to the default setup of tabs. They have added the Quick Tabs and the Tab List feature one of which is the default in Firefox as well and the other can be added with a mere free add-on. Tabbed browsing is a good feature to any browser, but the fact still remains with many tabs opened at the same time, for any browser, the tab bar gets congested. Both these browsers support 9 tabs displayed at one point of time before they are hidden to the left or right at standard 1024 x 768 resolutions.
Firefox manages to show more of the tab titles than IE does, which makes Firefox the better tabbed browser out of the two. Actually, earlier I did mention that bit about relevance in the previous paragraph, here it is. If you make the buttons on the tab bar a drop-down, does it increases the single view of tabs to 13 at a time? Why couldn't it just be a simple separate tab bar altogether?
Add-ons
This is the most crucial part for a browser; support for add-ons. These mere add-ons add life to the browser or provide you with a lot more functionality; be it just information like the weather forecast or outright utility like the mouse gestures. IE never had support for Add-ons; this time with the new version released they have included support for Add-ons. Firefox, from the very start, supported add-ons.
If they both support add-ons, then what's the difference? IE add-ons are paid; while Firefox, being an open-source project, all its add-ons are free. Firefox, at the moment, also faces problems regarding its add-ons as this version isn't backward compatible with the add-ons made for Firefox 1.5. It is just a matter of time before all of them are recoded by their developers to work with Firefox 2. Most of the popular add-ons have already been re-written, so that you won't feel handicapped. Also, Firefox just released an update of 1.5 which you can access here so that you get the full support of even the previous add-ons and themes while they are ported to Firefox 2.0.
Themes are also a part of add-ons in the new Firefox and the add-ons are called "extensions". IE, being a part of the whole windows package, doesn't require a separate themes section, but it wouldn't be a bad option, after all they were anyways at it; cosmetic changes.
RSS Feeds
People, who are online for most of the day, love to have RSS feeds. RSS feeds are now a part of the browser to make available any update as and when there is a change in whichever site that offers RSS feeds. IE 7 has a button, which lights up orange whenever you visit a site that has RSS feeds else it stays grey.
Clicking the button, takes you to the site's page where you can subscribe and the same button also doubles as a drop-down of various RSS feeds you have subscribed for. The organization in IE is better than the Live Bookmarks of Firefox. In the beta version of Firefox, there was supposed to be some major work done to the Live Bookmarks.
Firefox has added support of many different RSS feeds softwares; while IE has its integrated one, with no choice for using any other. The RSS feeds for IE handled by itself are good enough, but the option of using a third party, which one always uses, should have been given. Firefox didn't waste too much time on developing a very good RSS feeds application; even though I'm happy with it, there will be many who are using the option of the third party provided by Firefox.
Security
The main issue, the browsers today face is that it is the reason why our PCs become vulnerable and same happens to the e-mail clients. Even if you say it's the internet; it is actually when you surf the internet, you surf via the browser, which is like an open invitation for attackers.
IE7 is supposed to be ground-breaking with regards to security enhancements as compared to IE 6.
At the end of the day, IE commands majority of the market making them the highest attacked browser. While Firefox is open source and the moment there is a security breach, it will easily be patched by anyone who has the knowledge to do so and there are many coders in the open-source community to do the job.
Performance
In this section, we look at the memory and CPU utilization of the browsers. Previously IE was very high in both CPU as well as memory utilization. So, speaking of which, adding tabs should have made things worse. IE 7 is tweaked and it is not all that demanding on system resources (talking about average PCs here). Firefox hasn't changed much, with the new version release. It has a lot more integrated and it's gone up a bit in the resource utilization. In fact, IE 7 uses lesser memory than Firefox does and Firefox uses lesser CPU power than IE 7. They both balance out in a way. Both browsers, without multiple tabs opened, use less than 15 MB of memory which is acceptable and it doubles with multiple tabs.
Extras
IE 7 has this new feature called Zoom and Clear Type View.
The zoom enhances the size; and the clear type view smoothens the text. As compared to that, Firefox 2.0 offers a special feature called, Spellcheck.
This feature allows you to check a text box with the option. The integrated Spellcheck will underline any wrong language.
Conclusion
At the end of the day, IE with its release of version 7, just managed to reach up to the level at which most other browsers already were a few months back. It isn't offering anything more that would attract someone to shift to IE. Firefox remains a better option and is still growing stronger, and considering that it's just a couple of years old, it is some achievement.